.

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

'Celebrities in politics Essay\r'

'I will get smashing to the point, I believe that when celebrities get involved in government natural action they draw attention a mode from the tangible political issues and campaigns at hand.\r\nHaving film stars in politics for endorsements will definitely draw a crowds and to a greater extent importantly votes. Because people love and run short enliven by the characters played by an individual and in the end they atomic number 18 in fact become blinded by who that individual really is. It is as if you give a dangerous person, or as I will refer to him as, â€Å"an evil give” some candy. Now a politico by him self is an evil constituent who does not nonplus candy. Without the candy it is very hard for an evil dower to attract little children into a car notwithstanding as soon a candy, or purge better a child’s preferred candy is introduced, this when put into context being a favorite actor, that is all the child sees and is blinded to whomever posses the candy, thusly getting into the car. This in essence is basically the answer of an obsessed fan when celebrities become involved in politics.\r\nIf you really want to dissect the purpose for celebrities in politics, or celebrity endorsements in general you be able to create six different categories, establishing credibility, attracting attention, associatory benefits, psychographic connection, demographic connection and mass appeal. What does this all crocked? Absolutely nothing! All the reasons why celebrities be brought into an election are reasons that should be irrelevant to the voters. well-nigh celebrities birth never actually done either social work, some of them are unaware of what’s going on, in the past some celebrities have actually debated the ideals of another individual that was in in that respect own party without actually knowing it.\r\nUp to now I have only been referring to actors as being celebrities but if we look it up in the dictionary, a celeb rity is simply a notable person, renown fame. Doesn’t that mean a politician could in fact also be a celebrity? Yes, Julius Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, Abraham Lincoln ,where politicians and celebrities in in that respect own respect and got in that respect fame from battles they won, world changing events they where part of. The difference between them and a novel day actors is they became famous for the things they did, it was who they where not a mask. exclusively on the contrary this could also work against a politition, for instance Bill Clinton, we don’t immortalize him for being the chairperson who sent the most multitude into war ever or getting the get together States out of a 250 billion dollar debt, no, the first thing that comes to mind when you hear Bill Clinton is Monica Lewinski.\r\nI’m not saying he didn’t do a lot of good things for the county Im unsloped saying that’s what he got the most packaging for. All this time wasted just because they cute to know if he lied. This is how celebrity gets in the way of politics, instead of speculating about impeaching the president for getting a blow job they should have been using there resources to gather more intelligence about terrorist activity in the middle east. At this time the president was no longer a polition, he was a celebrity, another Paris Hilton, instead of a tape recording it was a dress.\r\nLet’s face it though, when it comes to celebrities and politics. Celebrities are simply more entertaining. Who would you rather see in an interview, Sonny Perdue (Governor or Georgia) or The Rock.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment