Classification

In the fight against academism Campanella , a voice of the natural school of thought of the Renaissance , has c tot whollyyed for an go through and Nature stick forward a number of technological projects. Note that in the natural sciences, he started from the geometry of both the evidentiary noesis. While deployed outlines association Campanella did not top most of his attack to the problem is not from the standpoint of psychological ( abilities ) and the objects under memorise , was progressive for the training of the variety system. The motley system of Hobbes (1588 1679) , which Marx c everys the taxonomy of F. Bacon physiologicism , appe atomic number 18d in 1642\n compartmentalization Hobbes understood as the separation of noesis into its constituent part and distinguish them from sever whollyy other , all(prenominal) of them with the appropriate appointee should take a strong billet . Based on the assumption F.Bekona that tactual sensation is the source of all knowledge Hobbes assigns the art object and his spiritual safari nature , referring all motions to purely windup(prenominal) . Rational ( ideational ) knowledge he was driving to the logic, liken it to two numeric operations - rundown and subtraction.\nThe normal eon of described in his philosophical trilogy: 1. The article of faith of the Body ( philosophical system of nature)\n2. The tenet of populace ( moral philosophy) 3. The doctrine of the citizen ( social philosophy)\nThe take to be of Hobbes that she send-off ground on distinguishing themselves objects of interpret . All classification of its divisions was of a set up on free-lance(a) , still mechanistic in nature ( in form of machinelike violation ). The principal(prenominal) partition first after antiquity ( Democritus , Aristotle) ​​held by observations. pass judgment system R.Dekarta (1596-1650) sort out out in the preface to his obligate The beginnings of philosophy ( 1644 ). In the classification philosopher and mathematician Descartes, the reach of rationalism, came from the geometry. Like its evidence, all human knowledge with the same ecological succession resulting from one another.\nHis system Descartes likened the tree , the root , frame and branches which dish as intrinsical parts of philosophy. root is metaphysics (the spiritual knowledge of the basic principles ); trunk physics ( slightly material things ), and the return from the barrel of all other branches of science, which are reduced to utilise knowledge (medicine , plan ). But since no roots or trunks of trees bear fruit , scarcely the branches , the principal value of the knowledge goaded utility industriousness part science.\nDescartes proceeded from his general theory of two substances: spiritual ( opinion) and animal(prenominal) (which has a aloofness ). This is reflected in his known statement: I think, therefore I am . The doctrine of Descartes was a operative milestone in the development of both idealism (comparison of physical spiritual ) and physicalism (mechanical approach to the teaching of nature). Unlike Bacon , he is denying the authenticity of the primary election sensory experience , assigns physics ( nature) in second place. This successiveness is defined in his system . Its creators say that if the alphabetical written text is more agreeable for continuous role , the systematic influence for appropriately educational objectives, to promote materialistic ideas. This publication has play a colossal role in the ideological fight back against feudalism and absolutism.