Korb v. Raytheon Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Korb v. Raytheon - Essay ExampleThis research will set about with the statement that Korb was a former Secretary of the acknowledgment between 1981 and 1985, later he coupled Raytheon Corporation, which supplied equipment to the army, navy blue and air forces of the US. For a short period, Korb was appointed as the Vice-President since he could strongly influence the Department of Defense and Congressmen whom he had achievemented with earlier. The President of Raytheon appointed Korb as the VP in Washington as he felt that Korb had a strong public image and his presence could politically and publically help Raytheon to develop itself. Korb also joined a nonprofit presidential term titled Committee for National Security (CNS) in December 1985 and this was the organization concerned with the prevention of nuclear armament. One day Korb spoke at a press convention related to defense budgets he was quoted in the dailies which stated that he was critical of high defense budgets and urged the governing body to spend less for warships and carriers. His statement was non taken well by the Department of Defense and umteen of the high-end defense officials complained to Raytheon about Korbs statements. Korb wished to clarify on the statements but in March 1986 his comp some(prenominal) relieved him of his post. He was given the choice of remaining in office as a special advisor, but at all future lecturinges, he would have to obtain prior consent. Raytheon also made it clear that Korb would not work in coordination with the Defense Department anymore. Korb was never happy with the deal given by Raytheon, and, hence, in 1987 filed a case to mom state civil court for a wrongful termination. He cited both the Massachusetts state laws concerning civil rights and the First Amendment of the Constitution in support of his opposition. However, Raytheon wanted the case to be heard on a bigger platform and moved the case to the Federal District courtroom located in Bost on. In order to ensure that he still could win the case, Korb changed his complaint and remove the references to the First Amendment. Since there was no federal involvement, the case was sent back to the Massachusetts state court. The Massachusetts court gave the judgment in favor of Raytheon, though Korb had the freedom of oral communication. Korb was in fact hired to work as an advocate and spokesperson of the company and if he brought the company in a bad light, accordingly he was ineffective, and the company was right to have fired an ineffective employee. Here Korb was not acting in private as it was his duty to bring about a good public image of Raytheon and by represent that the defense budgets had to be lowered, he was, in fact, tarnishing the name of the company. A company can pursue any legal and ethical cause as it was seen that Korb was harming the name of his company. Korb could be accused of being inefficient and in public spoiling the name of his company. Korb, i n general, had a right to freedom of speech but in this case, his speech directly interfered with his role in the company, for which the court granted the case in favor of Raytheon. Challenges with freedom of speech The court agreed that any person, including Korb, had the right to deliver a speech on a offspring of public concern, including nuclear spending. Korb was basically hired to be a spokesperson with Raytheon and if he spoke against Raytheon, it did not interfere with his freedom of speech but was in direct conflict with his role at Raytheon. Hence, Raytheon could brush off him for being ineffective at his work and, thus, his dismissal could not be considered a wrongful termination.